Request / portal
Reduce empty object pickers, poor filtering, missing customer context, and request handling exceptions.
Continuous Assets quality governance for Jira Service Management
Give Assets administrators a clear operating view of CMDB trust before incomplete, stale, or weakly related records break request forms, imports, automation, reports, or audit evidence.
Dashboard
Quality governance overview
Score
87%
Findings
142
Severe
18
Top risk: Request / portal remediation
Dashboard
Assets governance overview
Quality score
87%
Covered by enabled policies
Open findings
142
Prioritized remediation items
Severe findings
18
Critical or high workflow risk
Last scan
Today
Scheduled governance run
Missing required attribute
LAP-1042 / MacBook Pro
Request / portal
Stale object
APP-229 / Billing Service
Audit / change
Missing relationship
SVC-031 / Customer Portal
Automation / AQL / API
Workflow-impact context
Assets quality work competes with daily administration. Assets Quality Guard connects each finding to the operational surface at risk, so cleanup starts where service delivery and evidence depend on reliable data.
Reduce empty object pickers, poor filtering, missing customer context, and request handling exceptions.
Verify stable identifiers, source freshness, user fields, and reference data before imports drift.
Find brittle attributes and relationships before smart values, scripts, or AQL consumers return incomplete data.
Improve confidence in lifecycle, owner, identifier, and relationship fields used in dashboards and CSV exports.
Surface stale services, missing ownership, and weak dependency evidence before change or audit review.
Keep broad object health visible when a record is not yet tied to a specific downstream workflow.
Operating model
Establish policy coverage, assess object data continuously, and export evidence-backed remediation work without changing customer Assets records.
Discover
Cache workspaces, schemas, object types, attributes, cardinality, labels, references, and AQL filters needed for policy-aware assessment.
Govern
Use schema and object-type policies for required attributes, stale objects, relationship expectations, and import readiness.
Assess
Prioritize findings by severity and workflow-impact context, with status that persists across scan history and remediation work.
Remediate
Hand teams a CSV queue with object keys, attributes, evidence, recommended remediation, and impact explanations.
Policy coverage
Start from administrator and workflow-specific policy coverage, then tune object-type policies to the data model already in JSM Assets.
Broad ownership, lifecycle, identifier, and freshness checks for administrator-led hygiene coverage.
Portal visibility, object selection, request type filtering, and customer or agent context signals.
Assets-side identifiers, source timestamps, user attributes, and reference fields used to reconcile imports.
Attributes and references that make automation rules, smart values, scripts, and API consumers less brittle.
Owner, lifecycle, identifier, location, vendor, and relationship fields needed for dependable reporting.
Ownership, lifecycle state, dependency, criticality, and freshness signals used in change review.
Atlassian-native trust
The app assesses Assets data and guides remediation without creating, updating, or deleting customer Assets objects. Findings remain focused on compact evidence, status, and remediation ownership.
Atlassian Marketplace
Install Assets Quality Guard to review CMDB reliability, identify workflow-impacting findings, and export a remediation queue for the teams that own the cleanup.
Request access
Share where JSM Assets governance is most fragile today, and we will follow up by email.